I realise the subject is identical to @Hsiung_Is_A_Robot 's “Xu Shooyong tried to warn us” Topic, but I’d like to take their observation in a completely different direction and a new Topic seemed appropriate.
A little recap of the relevant facts :
-
May 2037 : Sanial colloid classified as class III IMD, decision attributed to tensions between Xu and the CCP.
-
June-November 2037 : ongoing conflict between Xu and the CCP (using Huawei as a patsy) as they class Huawei’s rival colloid as a Class I, accusations of proprerty theft.
-
March 2040 : Xu accuses the CCP of covering up biosurveillance as healthcare.
-
April 2040 : former CCP general Xi Jinping demands investigation against Xu for “inciting subversion of state power” and “violations of law and discipline.”. The CCDI declines, attributed to a power struggle inside the politburo.
-
Spetember-October 2040 : Xu is suddenly buddy buddy with the CCP, resurrecting the mìngyùn program with the use of G6.
So let me get this straight : the politburo keeps getting into conflict with Xu. Xu is accused of subverting state power. The politburo has an internal power struggle. Then the politburo is allied with Xu.
What happened ? Could be that their priorities simply shifted, or maybe they simply saw that Xu was the more popular choice of who to back up. Or it could be that Xu actually backed, orchestrated or was in some way involved with CCP’s power struggle, and ended up on the side of the victors.
I just don’t see Xu simply starting to work with people who caused him so much trouble, unless those people weren’t involved anymore. And I don’t see why the CCP wouldn’t simply keep going with Huawei, when Xu had been so antagonistic in the past.
Like this is too “consiracy theory” for me, but something is going on, and I don’t think it’s mind control (sorry).
So yeah. Thoughts ? Anyone has any idea about what went on there ?
(I also don’t think this has anything to do with Xu’s death - if anything did happen there, it was 9 years ago. If someone wanted Xu dead for that, they’d have taken their shot already)
6 Likes
Yeah, April 2040 must have been one of those months that lasted a thousand years.
In April 2040, Xu fired Gong Peiqiang, Zhupao’s CTO and standing member of the Beijing Xicheng District Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), naming Hagen as Gong’s successor. He also completed a corporate ownership restructuring plan to limit the decision-making power of Zhupao’s CCP-adjacent shareholder bloc.
Wresting control from the state agencies owning 52% of the company is just wild. Although ousting Gong may have been closing the barn door after the horses got out, considering where he landed.
But then there’s this.
On April 10th 2040, a leaked set of procurement notices filed by Huawei and the CETC revealed that the Social Credit System (SCS) and the Integrated Joint Operations Platform (IJOP) were being merged with mìngyùn under the CCP’s “one person, one file” directive, proving Xu’s claims.
If I’m reading this right, this was the argument within the Politburo 2037-2039: exert power over citizens via economic levers (SCS/Zhupao) or physical domination (IJOP/Huawei). But in early 2040 the chessboard changes – suddenly it’s not just about maintaining control within China anymore, because there’s a scary new disease and WHO’s director-general is an old friend of the PRC government. Huawei is still the teacher’s pet, but Zhupao can do networks, it can move data around, and WHO’s positioned to authorize moving data across borders. By early May, Zhupao’s been written into the CCP strategy for a new healthcare system built around informatics.
2 Likes
Keep in mind that as a result of criticism of the Huawei partnership, Xu had been expelled from CCP in 2038 and put on one year probation.
Basically, the events between April 3rd and 12th of 2040 can almost be seen a coup in China.
Xu goes against the General Secretary of the CCP and wins by using privileged information he had access to through Zhupao. I can imagine many members of the CCP seeing this as proof that Zhupao had infiltrated enough aspects of society as to make it very hard to stand up to Xu, and withdrawing support from Xi Jinping.
It’s a critical inflection point in my opinion, and from then on you see China (and, via Chinese influence, the UN and the WHO) in almost constant agreement with Zhupao’s goals, facilitating them.
Not trying to overstep here, this thread is already pretty well sourced, but I wanted to drop a reading that’s been sticking with me.
I wasn’t anywhere near the political side of this back then, so take this with some salt, but I don’t know if Xu’s priorities were truly aligned with the CCP… or if someone adjusted what data the CCP’s internal review committees were even seeing around 2040. The timeline doesn’t read like a reconciliation, it reads like a visibility correction.
I remember from my old Sanial contract days, during the early neuroid interface audits, that a lot of what got surfaced upstream depended on who built the filter. It wasn’t about what the raw data said. It was about what version of the story the dashboard was designed to emphasize. If something similar was happening here: if the G6-facing or WHO-facing readouts diverged from CCP internal signals, Xu’s “reinstatement” might’ve been a shift in optics, not reality.
Again, I wasn’t anywhere near this level of access back then. But the pacing of events between April 3rd and 12th always felt… orchestrated. Not narratively, just structurally. Curious if anyone else sees that pattern… or if this is just the old audit brain acting up.
1 Like