I don’t think that Adria caused that drone to go haywire. This whole thing just screams cover-up to me.
First of all, it feels like they blamed this on Adria WAY too quick. There were mentions of the attack being linked to Adria present on Omnipedia the day of the attack, even before the MPS stated that there was a “strong link” to Adria. Also, Adria is a super-hacker, yet they were able to to track down the specific terminal the attack came from and arrest a suspect in less than 2 hours (Hong Lian was arrested 15:20 IST, or 18:20 CST). That just sounds fishy
Second of all, we don’t even know who or what Adria is, and the only thing we know about their motive is that they don’t seem to like Zhupao. That just screams “scapegoat” to me.
Now, why would Omnipedia, and by extension Zhupao, immediately blame the attack on Adria. Well, it’s simple. The way the public originally found out about Adria was through a leak of G6 data, meaning Zhupao were using G6 to track them. This was illegal, as Zhupao was breaking the WHO charter rules. Now, lets say that for some reason Zhupao wanted to continue doing this without scrutiny. What would be the best way to make it so that the tracking of Adria was viewed as morally ethical by the general populace? Easy.
Make Adria look like a terrorist.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.