We’re seeing that Omnipedia pretty blatantly alters or outright redacts any criticism of Zhupao and G6, so I’m wondering why the section about “more outspoken anti-G6 sentiment from countries and political groups” in the G6 article was not only retained between edits, but expanded with further examples!
Also, the citation for the South African President’s demise refers to something called APF, which is defined as “affective perception feedback” in the hover text. It seems to have triggered his death, which then led to South Africa exiting G6. Any thoughts on what it could be? My guess it’s related to something that neural colloids can cause, either deliberately or accidentally.
1 Like
I’m still catching up on the APF discussion, so apologies if this has already come up, but something about the South Africa entry is bothering me. Not in a conspiratorial way, more like my brain keeps catching on the wording.
I worked in health-IT QA for Sanial for a couple of years (contracted, nothing glamorous). My team handled internal audit tools for tracking incident response timelines on MEA firmware updates. Because of that, I ended up reading a lot of documentation around CMD alerts and how G6 operators were expected to manage false positives.
Here’s the thing: I distinctly remember the early CMD “second wave” false alarm being dated months later than what the article shows now. I even tried digging through some cached versions, but every mirror I’ve found matches the current timeline. I’m assuming I’m just misremembering… it was chaotic work, long hours, and most of the documentation lived behind Sanial’s internal wiki anyway, but the mismatch has been stuck in my head since yesterday.
This might intersect with APF, but I don’t want to draw lines that aren’t there. The hover text currently defines APF as “affective perception feedback,” but I’m nearly positive it used to be “affective performance feedback” in earlier Sanial material. Maybe just a naming change, but the shift feels… off.
Has anyone checked older CMD pages recently? Or has Omnipedia done one of its quiet post-rollout “harmonizations” again? Not trying to feed theories; just trying to get my bearings. The more I read lately, the more I feel like I’m remembering the wrong version of events.
I’m wondering about the exact timeline regarding Sanial’s development of colloids and the role those played in the CMD pandemic, so I welcome an insider’s perspective on this 
Sanial was in the first round of investments for Zhupao Campus, which was sometime between 2032 and 2034 - that is, its founding and second investment round. That’s relevant because 2034 is considered to be the year when PTAE entered the food chain (with Lassgard tuna entering the market), meaning that Zhupao had access to the diagnostic solution for CMD not only before the disease was detected, but before the outbreak even started.
I’m not 100% with the idea that Zhupao started (or knew about) the whole thing - I don’t wanna rush to conclusions, but it seems at least plausible.
