Adira is a black hole in your brain

(I initially wrote this as a reply to @guasipatiii’s post about Adira as a sentient AI, but then it ballooned so much that I figured it best to make a new thread to avoid taking away from their thoughts)

I’ve been working out a theory about Adira being an AI that emerged and evolved inside G6, though I wouldn’t go so far as to say that this AI achieved sentience or is killing people to ensure its own existence. That’s a little too close to Roko’s Basilisk for my comfort, considering the hold that thought experiment had over the technocrats of the 2020s.

My theory about Adira being an AI took a hard turn into a different direction following this 10/07 update to the G6 article and this 10/08 update to the Adira article. The 10/07 update mentions that the withering of disconnected G6 data is patterned on misfolding proteins, with an initial corruption triggered and then cascading across the data. The 10/08 update phrases the potential of a sentient AI emerging from G6 in a way that reads, to me at least, as exactly that pattern of one misfolding protein converting others in an exponential cascade:

The fact that both updates carry the same citation further cements this interpretation for me:

My theory solidified when I noticed that the heading for the 10/08 update reads “Rogue or sentient AI.” There have been instances of AIs performing unintended behaviors, most ominously referenced as a phenomenon called a ghost layer:

While specifically linked to pre-PACOTTI AIs, there’s no mention of this phenomenon being impossible to occur with PACOTTI, as the recently added Criticism section of its article mentions that “the exact manner in which the system solves problems cannot be interrogated” (using the same mention of a black box as in the Adira article quoted above).

Whatever Adira is or isn’t, we can assume that it does mean something to Zhupao, or they wouldn’t be keeping a highly illegal search operation active across all of G6 in order to track it down. But what if Adira isn’t the thing they’re looking for? What if Adira is the thing that’s looking?

We recently learned that Zhupao is enforcing a mass brainjacking campaign to make anyone with a colloid/subscribed to G6 dismiss the network’s constant neural mining. I imagine it would take an unprecedented amount of computation and neural data processing to maintain this brainjacking on a daily (or more accurately, nightly) basis, so it stands to reason that Zhupao would develop and use an AI for that purpose.

What if Adira is the name of that AI, and it suddenly decided to optimize its task by not only forcing people to dismiss the neural mining but also all awareness of itself? That would mean even Zhupao is unaware of what Adira is doing, of its very existence. It would explain why Zhupao was seemingly caught by surprise when the search term leaked in 2045, prompting them to scramble for the excuse of an elusive hacker with the power to brainjack people.

That’s my working theory about Adira: it’s not a sentient AI inside G6, but a black hole in the neural network where anything could be growing, and no one with a colloid can look at it directly. It’s a memory hole that memory-holed itself.

ghost layers are probably the most misunderstood technical term of the colloid age - there’s nothing magical about them and i wish the press would stop using the term. in my opinion, omnipedia’s section on this should highlight that this terminology is contested. a ghost layer is a bug, nothing more, nothing less. there is no ghost in the machine.

pacotti is a black box but as far as most of the public are concerned, so is the majority of the technology we use every day. how much do you know about the lighting array in your apartment or the tv foil you watch every evening? not knowing how something works doesn’t mean something bad is happening inside it.

1 Like

Hello @CuthbertSaddlebag. I just noticed that I actually never wrote the ‘Adira as a sentient AI’ post :face_in_clouds:

1 Like

I definitely agree that ghost layer comes across as overly dramatic and sinister to describe what is basically a bug. I’m not saying there’s a ghost in the machine or in our brains, I only use the term black hole to describe something that can’t be looked at directly, something that can only be inferred by the effect it has on its surroundings.

And yes, I couldn’t explain to you how my TV foil works, let alone repair the damn thing when it breaks down, but there are people who can do both. Is that the case with a PACOTTI unit? It’s described as a black box that confounds even its creators to the point that they can’t explain exactly how it solves problems. In that respect, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch that an AI can exhibit a bug.

Wouldn’t be the first time a bug gets turned into a feature…